Negligent security cases are a specific type of premises liability claim, where a person is harmed due to inadequate or insufficient security measures at a property. In North Carolina, negligent security cases have become increasingly prominent as individuals seek justice after suffering injuries or losses due to criminal acts on properties where proper safety measures were not enforced. Property owners and managers have a duty to ensure that reasonable safety precautions are in place to protect visitors or residents. When they fail to do so, and harm occurs as a result, they may be held liable for negligent security. Understanding the recent outcomes of such cases in North Carolina can offer valuable insight into how courts handle these claims and the importance of legal representation in pursuing justice. Phillips & McCrea, PLLC can provide knowledgeable legal guidance and strong representation to those affected by negligent security accidents, ensuring their rights are protected and they pursue the compensation they deserve.
What Constitutes Negligent Security?
Negligent security occurs when a property owner or operator fails to take reasonable steps to provide a safe environment, thereby allowing a crime such as assault, robbery, or another violent act to take place on their premises. While property owners are not responsible for preventing all criminal acts, they are expected to implement certain security measures that could deter foreseeable crimes. These measures can include adequate lighting, functioning security cameras, security personnel, and other protections that could reduce the likelihood of criminal activity.
In North Carolina, negligent security claims typically arise in situations where individuals are victimized on commercial properties such as shopping centers, apartment complexes, hotels, or parking lots. When property owners neglect their duty to provide basic security measures and someone suffers harm as a result, the victim may have grounds for legal action. Negligent security cases are often complex, as they involve both premises liability laws and issues of foreseeability regarding criminal activity on the property.
Key Elements in Proving Negligent Security
For a negligent security claim to succeed in North Carolina, several elements must be proven. First, the plaintiff must establish that the property owner or operator owed them a duty of care to provide reasonable security. This duty is typically based on the relationship between the property owner and the person harmed, such as a business owner’s duty to their customers or a landlord’s duty to their tenants. Once this duty is established, the plaintiff must show that the property owner breached this duty by failing to provide adequate security measures.
Attorney Attorney Attorney
Michael Phillips
Marcel McCrea
Natalie Andruczyk
Next, the plaintiff must prove that the breach of duty directly led to their injuries or losses. This step often involves demonstrating that the crime that caused the harm was foreseeable based on prior incidents of criminal activity on or near the property. For example, if there had been multiple reports of assaults in a dimly lit parking lot, the property owner might be held liable for failing to install sufficient lighting to deter future crimes. Finally, the plaintiff must prove that they suffered actual damages, such as physical injuries, emotional distress, or financial losses, as a result of the property owner’s negligence.
Recent North Carolina Negligent Security Cases
North Carolina has seen several significant negligent security cases in recent years, each highlighting different aspects of how these claims are evaluated by the courts. One such case involved an apartment complex where a resident was assaulted in a poorly lit common area. The complex had a history of criminal activity, and the plaintiff argued that the property management company failed to install sufficient lighting or hire security personnel to patrol the grounds. The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that the property owner’s negligence in providing basic security measures directly contributed to the resident’s injuries. This case underscores the importance of proper lighting and surveillance in high-risk areas, especially in properties with a known history of criminal incidents.
Michael was a pleasure to work with. He made sure all of my questions were answered in a timely manner. His compassion to help allowed me to receive excellence throughout my experience, i would highly recommend his expertise” - Anonymous Philips and McCrea Law firm provided excellent service to entire family and friends. There have been several situations that I/family /friends have depended on their legal service’s. On each occasion they have been professional, knowledgeable and dependable. Providing excellent representation and guidance under stressful situations. I would highly recommend their legal service." - Denise Simply great legal service. They were professional, easy to work with and thorough. I have been very pleased with their service and would highly recommend them to my friends and colleagues as exceptional Charlotte attorneys." - Logan Abrams 
Another case involved a hotel where a guest was robbed at gunpoint in the parking lot. The plaintiff alleged that the hotel management failed to take adequate precautions to protect guests, particularly given the hotel’s location in a high-crime area. Despite being aware of the risks, the hotel had no security cameras or guards patrolling the parking lot. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, emphasizing that the hotel had a duty to provide reasonable security, especially in light of the foreseeable risk of crime in the area. This ruling highlighted the importance of location-based security measures, particularly for businesses in high-crime neighborhoods.
In a more complex case, a victim of sexual assault at a large commercial shopping center brought a negligent security claim against the property owner. The plaintiff argued that the shopping center management was aware of previous reports of sexual harassment and assault in the area, yet failed to increase security measures such as patrolling security guards or adding emergency call stations. The court examined the foreseeability of the crime, weighing the shopping center’s knowledge of prior incidents against their actions, or lack thereof, to protect visitors. The ruling ultimately favored the plaintiff, reinforcing that property owners must take proactive measures to prevent foreseeable crimes when they have knowledge of previous threats.
Factors Influencing Negligent Security Outcomes
Several factors play a critical role in determining the outcome of negligent security cases in North Carolina. One of the most important considerations is the concept of foreseeability, or whether the property owner could have reasonably anticipated the crime that occurred. Courts often look at the history of criminal activity on or near the property, considering whether prior incidents were similar to the crime in question. If a property owner is aware of ongoing criminal activity and fails to address the security risks, they are more likely to be found liable for negligence.
Choosing a Personal Injury Attorney Personal Injury Case Case TimelineRelated Videos
The adequacy of the security measures in place at the time of the crime is another significant factor. Property owners are not expected to provide perfect security, but they are required to implement reasonable measures based on the specific risks associated with their property. This can include installing sufficient lighting, maintaining functional security cameras, hiring security personnel, or ensuring that locks and gates are in working order. When a property owner fails to take these basic precautions, and harm occurs as a result, they may be held accountable for negligent security.
Finally, the victim’s own behavior may also influence the outcome of a negligent security case. In some instances, defendants may argue that the plaintiff’s actions contributed to the crime or their injuries, potentially reducing the property owner’s liability. North Carolina follows the doctrine of contributory negligence, meaning that if the plaintiff is found to have contributed to their injuries in any way, they may be barred from recovering damages. This makes it especially important for plaintiffs to work with an attorney who can effectively argue against claims of contributory negligence and demonstrate that the property owner’s failure to provide adequate security was the primary cause of the harm.
The Role of Legal Representation in Negligent Security Cases
Navigating a negligent security case in North Carolina can be a complex and challenging process. Plaintiffs must not only prove that the property owner failed to provide reasonable security, but also demonstrate that the crime was foreseeable and that they suffered actual damages as a result. This often requires gathering extensive evidence, such as police reports, witness statements, and testimony on security standards. Additionally, plaintiffs may need to counter claims of contributory negligence, which can be a significant barrier to recovery under North Carolina law.
Having skilled legal representation is crucial in these cases, as experienced attorneys understand the nuances of negligent security claims and how to build a strong case. A knowledgeable attorney can help victims gather the necessary evidence, consult with security specialists, and present a compelling argument in court. Moreover, they can negotiate with insurance companies and property owners to pursue a fair settlement, ensuring that victims receive the compensation they deserve for their injuries, emotional distress, and financial losses.
Negligent security cases are not just about holding property owners accountable; they are also about preventing future harm by encouraging property owners to implement better safety measures. By pursuing legal action, victims can help raise awareness of the importance of adequate security and contribute to making public and private spaces safer for everyone.
If you or a loved one has been injured due to negligent security in North Carolina, it is crucial to seek legal representation to protect your rights. The experienced attorneys at Phillips & McCrea, PLLC understand the complexities of these cases and are committed to helping victims pursue justice. With a deep understanding of North Carolina premises liability laws, Phillips & McCrea, PLLC will work tirelessly to hold negligent property owners accountable and seek the compensation you deserve. Contact Phillips & McCrea, PLLC today to schedule a consultation and discuss your case.