In North Carolina, negligent security claims arise from situations where individuals are harmed due to inadequate security measures on a property. These claims fall under the broader category of premises liability law, which holds property owners and operators responsible for maintaining safe environments for visitors. When a property owner fails to provide reasonable security measures — and someone is injured as a result — the victim may have grounds to pursue a negligent security lawsuit. Understanding the intricacies of these laws is crucial for both victims seeking justice and property owners aiming to fulfill their legal obligations.
Attorney Attorney Attorney
Michael Phillips
Marcel McCrea
Natalie Andruczyk
The Foundation of Negligent Security Claims
Negligent security claims are based on the principle that property owners have a duty to protect individuals from foreseeable harm while on their premises. This duty is particularly relevant in places where there is a heightened risk of criminal activity — such as parking lots, shopping centers, apartment complexes, and bars. The key element in a negligent security claim is whether the harm was foreseeable and if the property owner failed to take reasonable steps to prevent it. For instance, if a property is located in an area with a history of violent crimes, the owner might be expected to install adequate lighting, security cameras, or hire security personnel.
To succeed in a negligent security claim in North Carolina, the plaintiff must prove several elements. First, they must establish that the property owner had a duty to provide adequate security. Next, they must demonstrate that the owner breached this duty by failing to implement reasonable security measures. The plaintiff must also show that this breach directly led to their injuries and that they suffered actual damages as a result. Each of these elements requires careful examination and supporting evidence to build a strong case.
Michael was a pleasure to work with. He made sure all of my questions were answered in a timely manner. His compassion to help allowed me to receive excellence throughout my experience, i would highly recommend his expertise” - Anonymous Philips and McCrea Law firm provided excellent service to entire family and friends. There have been several situations that I/family /friends have depended on their legal service’s. On each occasion they have been professional, knowledgeable and dependable. Providing excellent representation and guidance under stressful situations. I would highly recommend their legal service." - Denise Simply great legal service. They were professional, easy to work with and thorough. I have been very pleased with their service and would highly recommend them to my friends and colleagues as exceptional Charlotte attorneys." - Logan Abrams 
Determining Foreseeability and Duty of Care
The concept of foreseeability is central to negligent security cases. Courts in North Carolina consider various factors to determine whether a crime was foreseeable. These factors include the nature, location, and history of criminal activity in the area. If similar crimes have occurred on or near the property, the court may find that the property owner should have anticipated the risk and taken appropriate measures to prevent harm. Additionally, the type of business conducted on the premises may influence the level of security expected. For example, a nightclub with a history of altercations may be required to have more robust security measures than a small retail store.
In determining the duty of care, courts also assess the relationship between the property owner and the victim. Invitees, such as customers or tenants, are owed the highest duty of care. Licensees, who enter the property for their own purposes with the owner’s permission, are owed a moderate duty. Trespassers, on the other hand, are owed the least duty of care. Property owners must understand these distinctions to effectively assess and fulfill their legal responsibilities.
Choosing a Personal Injury Attorney Personal Injury Case Case TimelineRelated Videos
Common Types of Negligent Security Incidents
Negligent security incidents can take various forms, depending on the nature of the property and its vulnerabilities. Some common examples include assault and battery, robbery, sexual assault, and even wrongful death. For instance, if a tenant in an apartment complex is attacked due to a broken security gate, the landlord may be held liable for failing to address a known security issue. Similarly, if a patron is injured in a parking lot robbery at a shopping center with inadequate lighting and security patrols, the property owner may be held accountable.
In some cases, negligent security claims may also involve inadequate training or supervision of security personnel. If a security guard fails to prevent a foreseeable crime or engages in inappropriate behavior, both the guard and the property owner may be liable for any resulting harm. These incidents highlight the importance of comprehensive security protocols and regular training to ensure that security personnel are prepared to respond effectively to potential threats.
Proving Negligence in Security Cases
Proving negligence in a security case requires meticulous gathering and presentation of evidence. Plaintiffs must demonstrate that the property owner knew or should have known about the risk of criminal activity and failed to take reasonable steps to prevent it. This can be accomplished through a combination of witness testimony, security camera footage, police reports, and analysis. Documentation of prior incidents on the property and any complaints or requests for increased security measures can also bolster a plaintiff’s case.
In addition to demonstrating a breach of duty, plaintiffs must establish a causal link between the lack of security and their injuries. This often requires the testimony of medical professionals and other specialists to substantiate the extent and impact of the injuries. The goal is to paint a comprehensive picture of how the inadequate security directly contributed to the harm suffered by the victim.
Defenses in Negligent Security Cases
Property owners facing negligent security claims have several potential defenses at their disposal. One common defense is arguing that the crime was unforeseeable and, therefore, not preventable through reasonable security measures. If the property is located in an area with a low crime rate and no prior incidents, the owner may contend that the crime was a random act that could not have been anticipated.
Another defense involves the issue of contributory negligence. In North Carolina, if the victim is found to have contributed to their injuries in any way, they may be barred from recovering damages. For example, if a victim ignored posted security warnings or engaged in reckless behavior that heightened the risk of harm, the property owner may argue that the victim’s actions were the primary cause of their injuries.
Property owners may also challenge the causal link between the lack of security and the victim’s injuries. They might argue that the harm would have occurred regardless of any security measures in place. In such cases, demonstrating the effectiveness of existing security protocols and highlighting the unpredictable nature of the crime can be key components of the defense strategy.
Legal Remedies and Compensation
Victims of negligent security incidents in North Carolina may be entitled to various forms of compensation. These can include medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and emotional distress. In cases involving severe injuries or wrongful death, victims or their families may seek additional damages for loss of companionship and future earning capacity. The goal of these legal remedies is to provide the victim with the financial support necessary to recover from their injuries and move forward with their lives.
In some instances, courts may also award punitive damages if the property owner’s conduct is found to be particularly egregious or reckless. Punitive damages are intended to punish the defendant and deter similar conduct in the future. However, these awards are rare and typically require clear evidence of willful misconduct or gross negligence on the part of the property owner.
Navigating the Legal Process
The legal process for pursuing a negligent security claim can be complex and time-consuming. Victims must navigate various stages, including investigation, filing a complaint, discovery, negotiation, and potentially trial. Each step requires careful attention to detail and adherence to legal procedures to ensure a favorable outcome.
Given the complexities involved, victims are strongly encouraged to seek legal representation from a knowledgeable attorney experienced in premises liability and negligent security cases. An attorney can guide the victim through each stage of the process, gather and present evidence effectively, negotiate with opposing parties, and advocate for the victim’s rights in court if necessary. With legal representation, victims can focus on their recovery while their attorney works to secure the compensation they deserve.
The Importance of Proactive Security Measures
Property owners can take proactive steps to reduce the risk of negligent security claims and enhance the safety of their premises. Conducting regular security assessments, staying informed about local crime trends, and implementing industry-standard security protocols are essential components of a comprehensive security strategy. Additionally, property owners should prioritize training and supervising security personnel to ensure they are equipped to handle potential threats effectively.
Communication with tenants, employees, and visitors is also crucial in fostering a safe environment. Encouraging individuals to report suspicious activity or security concerns can help property owners identify potential risks and address them before they escalate into serious incidents. By taking a proactive approach to security, property owners can not only protect themselves from legal liability but also create a safe and welcoming environment for everyone on their premises.
Contact Phillips & McCrea, PLLC Today
Navigating the complexities of negligent security laws in North Carolina requires a deep understanding of legal principles and practical considerations. Phillips & McCrea, PLLC is dedicated to providing comprehensive legal support for victims of negligent security incidents. With a commitment to advocating for clients’ rights and securing fair compensation, our experienced attorneys offer personalized guidance through every step of the legal process. If you or a loved one has been affected by a negligent security incident, contact Phillips & McCrea, PLLC today to explore your legal options and pursue the justice you deserve.